Sottotitolo:
Today natural gas is cheaper and less polluting in respect to other sources. It will be dominant until the renewables get to be competitive.
The nuclear catastrophe in Japan will probably have a number of serious consequences. Possibly, it may have already sealed for ever the destiny of nuclear energy. Europe , France except , is moving along this way , although some countries will probably complete the plants that they have been building, some of which long overdue.
However, some countries, for example China, may continue to build nuclear power stations as they are striving for an energy mix that will include all sources including coal and oil, both partly imported, and renewables. Again, the nuclear experts may be able to learn from the accidents , and will perhaps propose to build much smaller power stations , the huge sizes chosen to have maximum of scale economies being probably one of the reasons why the huge monsters are so difficult to control.
This third way would probably be the ideal, but our experience does not count a large number of “ideal” solutions being adopted. Nuclear energy has been going for half a century , and the experts tend not to answer the questions coming from outside their strict circles. So we may consider as given some largely negative effect on nuclear projects at least in Europe. What will take the place of nuclear energy ?
The answer is that natural gas is the energy source that will allow us the time necessary for the renewables to “mature” industrially and economically. Oil has now a very high price, almost about hundred times higher compared with fifty years ago, and has a strong tendency to keep increasing. Oil products are used nowadays exclusively for transport: road transport with gasoline and gasoil, sea transport with gasoil and fuel oil, air transport with kerosene and aviation gasoline. For the road , we have already a variety of additives to oil products, like ethanol, an alcohol obtained from sugar cane or similar plants, which however, competes with production of food for acreage, and makes the food situation ever worse that it should be. The amount of heavy fuel oil used for burning is rapidly diminishing in Europe and in the US, although some gasoil is still used especially in the US for household heating.
Natural gas will take over , being cheaper , less polluting and with lower CO2 emissions. Demand for oil will be coming from people driving cars and lorries in Europe and in the US , while countries like China and India will probably aim for to more complex mixes, in which oil will play still a relevant part. The oil reserves know to day , and what it is hoped to be found in the next decade will probably allow the recent life style of Americans , and, to a smaller extent , of Europeans to continue with motorways , commuting by car , and lorry transport.
However, such a life stile is becoming more expensive , and less confortable. Oil at hundred dollars or more per barrel might not allow this way of living to continue , and the pressure for public transport , especially on rails, will increase, gradually becoming cheaper and less tiring, comparing with oil driven cars or busses. Gas will produce electricity, heat houses , provide industrial fuel: so we have to ask ourselves from where such gas will come to us . Europe has almost completely exhausted its own gas, first that found in Italy, and then tha,t much bigge,r of the North Sea . Reserves are dwindling , and the areas considered as positive from the industry are almost all well developed. However, gas is no more a “local” fuel as it was in its first years. Europe and USA are criss-crossed by pipelines, and ships loaded with liquefied gas move from production to the market everywhere.
Europe is particularly well connected with the North, Russia, and with the South, the North Africa, while American companies have defined a technology to obtain gas from reservoirs which were not exploitable with the traditional technology , provoking a strong increase of internal production. The main supplier for Europe is Russia, and this may be a problem, because American authorities never liked Europe “depending” from Russia for gas , in the same way they did not like Europe buying Russian crude , which was supposed to weaken Europe into submission.
To day, as submission is not probable , they talk of “ control ” of the market , as if the Russian seller had any interest to bring Europe into misery, and kill their best client. This is not going to happen. The problem create some years ago by the Russia-Ucraina tangle was solved pretty quickly, and the Russians are now completing the pipeline under the Baltic to supply Germany directly. The relations existing between Russia and Europe is that of a continuum of countries not separated by any physical border . One side is a producer and exporter of raw materials and energy sources ; and the other is a group of countries importing that and exporting the machinery and industrial goods that the first imports. In international trade there is no better set up. The two players are almost equally balanced. If the seller of gas does not sell, he will have no money , and will not be able to buy the industrial imports that he needs, and vice versa. There is no overwhelming power here or there, but only the need of commercial confidence in each other.
Of course, gas will be dominant only as long as it remains cheaper than its alternatives , that is, until the renewables get to be competitive. That is bound to happen. First, because oil prices will keep increasing. Second , public incentives are already reducing costs , and moving the entire sector into an industrial proposition. Of course , electricity production with a large share of renewables, sun or wind, will require a reorganisation of the entire electric industry and consumption, as sun does not operate at night , when light is really necessary, and wind operates only when wind actually moves the windmill. That means that the electric grid, and perhaps even the single system of every user will have to change progressively, into “intelligent” solutions both for the ability of the grid to take discontinuous productions , and the capacity of the consumer to optimise his energy use . Gas is not scarce , and its reserves will last well beyond the moment in which the networks will work as they should. And oil will not disappear. Actually , the success of gas will prolong its life, until we find a better way to move , individually of collectively, that the burning of oil.